In February 2017 WHO hosted Rehabilitation 2030. According to reports, it was a call for action, which brought together over 200 rehabilitation experts from 46 different countries. The meeting highlighted the urgent need to address the extremely unmet needs for rehabilitation around the world.
The word ‘Rehabilitation’ scares most of us, fact being that it is attached to disability. Statistics show that within the past decade, the need for rehabilitation has increased drastically across the globe. As issues needing rehabilitation increases, so also is the need for it. There has been notable increases in the prevalence of alcohol use disorders, opioid use disorders, major depressive disorder, just to mention a few. All these just give us navigation signals to where the world is going.
Though we are aware, or getting to know more about real health issues and disorders that need urgent rehabilitation, the world is however getting trapped by some other forces that we have created by ourselves. Looking through a research by the Center for Disease Control in the United States, it shows that there has been a 25% increase in suicide rates since 1999. Half of all U.S states experienced a dramatic increase of more than 30%. The research also shows that in more than half of those cases, the individuals were not diagnosed with a mental health condition.
There have been many suggestions to the cause(s) of the research result. As stated, some suggest that economic factors can increase the risk of suicide. The principal deputy director of the CDC also made an important contribution to this, stating that limited access to care, behavioral and social serves and interaction may also increase the risk of suicide.
How can there be an increase in suicide rates and depression, having lack of social interaction and care as major causes? Over the past decade, statistics show that social interaction has greatly increased, however, virtually. Looking at these statistics, does this raise a very valid question? What is the correlation between increased virtual interaction and relationships and the increase of certain ills in the society?
An article by Bryan Kramer relays that technology has become an electronic addiction for some, taking them out of the physical world as they cling to the features it offers. And like many addictions, there is an impact on the number and quality of relationships and interactions. Conversations through social media are beginning to take the place of traditional interactions and discussions; eventually, a person does not even need to leave the house to communicate with others. This can lead to social isolation, which can be crippling for many.
Human beings naturally long for connection and belonging. Several studies have linked social support to positive mental health, Psych Central reports. Research has further revealed people with fewer social relationships die earlier on average than those with more. Yet with the rise of social media, there are concerns that many are substituting virtual, online connections for real-life, social relationships.
Just as the internet has given room for virtual interaction, so has it given room for virtual living. On social media, people tend to put up their ‘best’ self while interacting with others. Qualities of deep, intimate relationships cannot be revealed on social media, as insecurities, conflicts and emotional weakness are generally concealed. Steven Furtick, Senior Pastor of Elevation Church USA, in a sermon, trying to illustrate how we have secret spots within us and hide them through screens, he said, “The screen keeps other people from seeing you as you really are… shame always creates a screen; a screen to keep you from being who you really are… we hide behind a screen where you create digital personas to hide your dysfunction. And in an age when we have more apparatus to connect than ever before, we are impotent to be intimate, because intimacy requires proximity”.
A typical person checks their phone every ten (10) minutes or less, amounting to about a hundred and fifty (150) times daily. This and other research facts show that this in itself creates a form of anxiety in the human mind. Someone said in a speech, “The hype generational segregation of our time is bizarre, unhealthy and historically unprecedented. You’ve never seen the like of people sitting at a table in a restaurant, not talking to each other, because they are texting and using their Facebook and Instagram and twitter. They are at the table and don’t even know each other, in the house and can’t talk to each other. And the pressure that’s on us to be like everybody else is so great that everybody tries to live like they’re in a reality show”.
Bill Maher said, “The tycoons of social media have to stop pretending that they friendly nerd gods building a better world, and admit they’re just tobacco farmers in t-shirts, selling an addictive product to children. Because, let’s face it: Checking your likes is the new smoking. Philip Morris just wanted your lungs; the app store wants your soul”. As derogatory as that sounds, we hardly can doubt its fact.
CBS News interviewed Tristan Harris, a former Google product manager. He made a lot of comments and assertions relating to this issue. One of which is the fact that whether they want to or not, Silicon Valley is shaping the thoughts, feelings, and actions of people. They are programming people. There’s always this narrative that technology is neutral. And it’s up to us to choose how we use it. This is just not true, Harris said. It’s not neutral. They want you to use it in particular ways and for long periods of time. Because that’s how they make their money.
One may chose not to completely agree, but we cannot completely doubt that, towards the negative, technology and social media advancements have made enormous contribution to the unsystematic way our society is moving today. Our society is severely suffering from lack of cooperation, misinformation, mistruth, misdirection, and what have you.
Did you know that the more people learn to communicate directly with other people, the less criminality in the society? Research shows that 90% of all criminals have difficulty communicating directly with other people. This goes a long way to show us the need for Social Rehabilitation. We need to rehabilitate ourselves to fit back into a more structured and flowing society, where people listen to, understand and encourage one another.
Social support can be strong predictor of positive mental health. Emotional support has shown to protect us from a wide array of both psychiatric and physical ailments. However, unlike online friendships, real-life relationships take time and effort. They help us learn about others and ultimately ourselves.
This article has no aim at shading the negative effects of social media and technology. It is imperative to state here that technology has done humanity a lot of good in making certain areas of work and our daily activities easier. However, we cannot neglect the rise of negativity that has been linked with the use of these technologies.
In a 1976 research conducted by Eric D. Auerbach and Mansell Pattison on Outcome of social rehabilitation: Whom does it help? , they highlighted that a successful subgroup of people examined comprised of clients who had a psychotic diagnosis and a history of acute psychiatric hospitalization. However, there was another subgroup, considered as unsuccessful in the research, which was comprised of clients who had neurotic and characterological diagnoses. They had no hospitalizations. This population was defined as “silent disabled”. They present a life of chronic disability with attendant chronic marginal emotional compensation. This latter population typically does not receive mental health services.
Unfortunately, forty-years after, the latter population typically describes most people in this tech age, especially those in their teens and young adults. This suggests that action must be taken in the direction of this trend. As that early research suggests, the treatment consideration of the two subgroups will have to differ. That is to say that a suggestion of about 2 billion of the world’s population seeing a skilled professional is unrealistic. Statistics show that there are less than 10 per 1 million population of skilled rehabilitation practitioners in many low-and-middle-income countries.
What then is the solution? Most times, it is easier to point out a problem than to proffer a viable solution to it. However, the aim of this article is to make considerable suggestion that can help reconnect people back to a well-structured and flowing society of personally interconnected individuals.